| 1,661 | 46 | 155 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
动态评估理论认为,对学习者语言能力的评估不是静态的、单一的结果,而是评估与发展的结合。动态评估的结果可以体现学习者的发展潜力、学习的迁移能力等多方面的状态,而不只是一个静态的测量分数。因此,不同于传统心理测量学方法,动态评估更强调学习者的发展潜力,即学习者现有水平和学习者通过专家、计算机等帮助调节下可以达到的水平之间的发展程度。自1997年社会学转向开端,动态评估已经被广泛地运用于特殊教育、学科教育、心理诊断以及心理康复领域,动态评估在语言评估与测试领域也越来越受到学者、测试开发人员以及教师的关注,然而,在汉语作为第二语言评估领域却鲜有研究。和动态评估相关的已有研究和理论评述中,大多将动态评估认为是另一种形式的形成性评估或档案袋评估,这是对动态评估理论基础与实施方式的误解。动态评估植根于Vygotsky的社会文化理论,本文首先从社会文化理论的视角来解读第二语言能力发展的本质,阐释动态评估的理论构建过程,并通过对动态评估和与之相关的其他重要理论的梳理,解读动态评估的真正内涵。通过对比动态评估和基于心理测量学的传统评估方式,总结动态评估的具体实施方式,以期为汉语作为第二语言研究者和教学实践者提供评估语言能力的新思路。
Abstract：Dynamic assessment(DA)is rooted in the sociocultural framework outlined by the psychologist L. S. Vygotsky and his colleagues. Contrary to the innatist view,sociocultural theory considers human cognition as developing with the ongoing interaction between the individual and with the environment. Instead of giving a static score,DA distinguishes itself from other approaches by maintaining that the unification of development and assessment during the assessment procedure is crucial to understanding learners' abilities and for promoting development during the assessment process itself. Unlike traditional psychometric tools,DA lays emphasis on learners' development potential implied by the difference between learner's independent performance and the performance which the learner can achieve with the assistance of an expert or a computer. Ever since the 1997 social turn,DA has been widely applied in education and psychology whereas in the second language assessment area it has received scant attention. The present paper outlines the theoretical framework for the application of dynamic assessment procedures to second language assessment and pedagogy by reinterpreting the concept of second language ability from the perspective of sociocultural theory. The paper concludes with a discussion of the criticisms leveled against DA and makes some suggestions for further research on DA's potential contributions to language assessment.
孔文,方洁2013另类评估的新发展:动态评估面面观[J].解放军外国语学院学报(1):57-61.//Kong Wen&Fang Jie 2013 The new development of alternative assessment:An overview of dynamic assessment[J].Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages(1):57-61.
张艳红2010大学英语写作教学的动态评价体系建构[J].解放军外国语学院学报(1):46-50.//Zhang Yanhong 2010 Constructing dynamic assessment mode in college English writing class[J].Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 33(1):46-50.
Aljaafreh,A.&J.P.Lantolf 1994 Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development[J].Modern Language Journal 78(4):465-483.
Budoff,M.1968 Learning potential as a supplementary assessment procedure[J].Learning disorders 3:295-343.
---1987 The validity of learning potential assessment[A].Dynamic assessment:An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential[C].New York:Guilford Press:53-81.
Budoff,M.&M.Friedman 1964“Learning potential”as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded[J].Journal of Consulting Psychology 28(7):434-439.
Feuerstein,R.1980 Instrumental Enrichment:Redevelopment of Cognitive Functions of Retarded Performers[M].University Park Press.
Feuerstein,R.,Y.Rand&J.E.Rynders 1988 The learning potential assessment device[A].In Don’t Accept Me as I am[C].Springer US:191-207.
Feuerstein,R.,Y.A.Rand&M.B.Hoffman 1979The Dynamic Assessment of Retarded Performers:The Learning Potential Assessment Device,Theory,Instruments,and Techniques[M].Scott Foresman&Co.
---2003 Dynamic Assessment of Cognitive Modifiability[M].ICELP(The International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential).
Grigorenko,E.L.&R.J.Sternberg 1998 Dynamic testing[J].Psychological Bulletin 124(1):75-111.
Guthke,J.1982 The learning test concept:An alternative to the traditional static intelligence test[J].German Journal of Psychology 6(4):306-324.
---1993 Developments in learning potential assessment[A].Learning potential assessment:Theoretical,methodological and practical issues[C].,43-67.
Guthke,J.&J.F.Beckmann 2000 The learning test concept and its application in practice[J].Dynamic assessment:Prevailing models and applications:17-69.
Haywood,H.C.&D.Tzuriel 2002 Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment[J].Peabody Journal of Education 77(2):40-63.
Haywood,H.C.&C.S.Lidz 2006 Dynamic Assessment in Practice:Clinical and Educational Applications[M].Cambridge University Press.
Kozulin,A.&E.Garb 2002 Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension[J].School Psychology International 23(1):112-127.
Lantolf,J.P.2006 Sociocultural theory and L2:State of the art[J].Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(1):67-109.
Lantolf,J.P.&M.E.Poehner 2010 Dynamic assessment in the classroom:Vygotskian praxis for second language development[J].Language Teaching Research,15(1):11-33.
Lidz,C.S.1991 Practitioner’s Guide to Dynamic Assessment[M].Guilford Press.
Lidz,C.S.&B.Gindis 2003 Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children[A].Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context[C].,99-116.
Luria,A.R.1961 Study of the abnormal child[J].The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 31:1-16.
Nassaji,H.&M.Swain 2000 A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2:The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles[J].Language Awareness 9(1):34-51.
Qin,T.&R.A.van Compernolle 2017 Computerized Dynamic assessment of L2 Chinese pragmatics comprehension[Z].Paper presented at American Association for Applied Linguistics.Portland,USA.
Sternberg,R.J.&E.L.Grigorenko 2002 Dynamic Testing:The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential[M].Cambridge University Press.
Swain,M.1993 The output hypothesis:Just speaking and writing aren’t enough[J].Canadian Modern Language Review 50(1):158-164.
Palinscar,A.S.,A.L.Brown&J.C.Campione 1991Dynamic assessment[A].Handbook on the assessment of learning disabilities:Theory,research,and practice[C].75-94.
Poehner,M.E.2007 Beyond the test:L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning[J].Modern Language Journal 91(3):323-340.
Poehner,M.E.&J.P.Lantolf 2005 Dynamic assessment in the language classroom[J].Language Teaching Research 9(3):233-265.
---2013 Bringing the zpd into the equation:Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment(C-DA)[J].Language Teaching Research 17(3):323-342.
Van der Aalsvoort,G.M.&C.S.Lidz 2002 Reciprocity in dynamic assessment in classrooms:Taking contextual influences on individual learning into accoun[A].Learning potential assessment and cognitive training:Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology 7(1):111-144.
Vygotsky,L.S.1986 Thought and language[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
---1998 Mind in society:The Development of Higher Psychological Processes[M].Harvard University Press.
Vygotskij,L.S.,R.W.Rieber&A.S.Carton 1987 The Collected Works of LS Vygotsky.(Vol.1),Problems of General Psychology Including the Volume Thinking and Speech[M].Springer.
Wertsch,J.V.1985 Adult-child interaction as a source of self-regulation in children[J].The growth of reflection in Children,69-97.
(1)zone of proximal development,简称ZPD。
(1)learning potential score,简称LPS。
(1)详情请参见宾夕法尼亚州州立大学网站:www.language.la.psu.edu。
基本信息:
DOI：10.16131/j.cnki.cn44-1669/g4.2018.02.004
中图分类号:H195.3
引用信息:
[1]高思畅,王建勤.动态评估——语言能力评估的新思路[J].华文教学与研究,2018,No.70(02):1-12.DOI:10.16131/j.cnki.cn44-1669/g4.2018.02.004.
基金信息:
国家社科基金重点项目:“汉语二语口语能力习得与高效率教学模式研究”(12AZD113);; 中国博士后基金面上资助项目:“汉语作为第二语言学习者口语韵律能力的评估”(2017M621516)~~
2017-06-06
2017
2017-11-01
2018-01-04
2018
1
2018-06-20
2018-06-20